Does This Look Like The Face Of A Guy Who Died Drunk Driving Whose Family Is Suing Club Risque Because The Shot Girls Gave Him Too Many Shots?
philly.com – The demise of George Thomas Fadgen III in a horrific one-car crash on Interstate 95 last fall can be traced to “shot girls” at Club Risque, according to a lawsuit filed against the Northeast Philadelphia strip club. Fadgen III, 46, spent about four hours at the club the night of Sept. 6, 2012 and into the next morning before leaving in his car, the lawsuit claims, noting that after his death in the crash less than a mile from Club Risque, he had a blood alcohol content of .19. Three separate times between his arrival at the club on Tacony Street at about 10:15 p.m. and his departure shortly after 2 a.m., Fadgen III, of the 11000 block of Basile Street in the Northeast, used the ATM inside the bar to withdraw $100. The lawsuit claims the club is at fault for Fadgen III’s death because it failed to adhere to Pennsylvania liquor-liability laws, also known as Dram Shop laws. They are meant to ensure liquor-serving establishments don’t continue to serve a patron after the person is “visibly intoxicated.” What do lawyers on behalf of his estate believe he spent that $300 on? The very accessible shots that waitresses carry around the club. “Club Risque, as asserted in the Complaint, broke the law by failing to operate in a lawful manner that would have protected George Fadgen from harm,” Barrett said. “Now it must be held accountable for its actions.”
By this logic, every obese person in America who dies of a heart attack should be able to sue the restaurants they frequented while they were alive, right? Because certainly it’s the restaurant’s fault that they didn’t stop these husky monsters from eating themselves into an early grave. They shouldn’t have been so selfish and taken the proper steps to “protect” these greasy sumbitches from self-harm. No reason why high-calorie establishments shouldn’t also be “held accountable for their actions” too.
Seriously, can’t anybody accept blame anymore? Surely George Thomas Fadgen III’s family is upset that he died after buying $300 worth of sugary bullshit shots all night, but blaming Krissy and Kiersten-Ann with the cesarean scar for feeding dude too many shots is obvious overkill.
who’s been voting for sam from Iona over Danielle?
Danielle is way hotter… it’s not even close.
i luh bad bitches thats my fuckin problem
That fucking title makes zero literary sense
He was at a strip club for 4 fuckin hours and NOBODY can think of anything he might have dropped $300 on other than shitty alcohol?? Nice post
well seeing as this is literally the face of a guy, who died drunk driving, whose family is suing club risque because the shot girls gave him too many shots, the answer to your question is we need pres back since the stool has gone to shit this week
Aren’t you court ordered to make this post about race?
@meathead because in Sam’s second photo, we picture those eyes looking up at us as she’s deepthroating a hard 5inches. you know shes a freak
1000 for what sizza said. I’d spend my $$ on boobs, not booze
It’s not about blame, it’s about money. Do you think the lawyers and Fadgen’s family want to use any money they got to open the Tommy Fadgen School For Titty Bar Drunks? Hell no. The want to buy new cars and vacation in St Baarts. It is ALL about money. Anyone saying it isn’t either doesn’t have any or is just a straight liar.
No, it looks like the face of Dan Le Batard.
As twisted as this might sound it really is the fairest way to hold people accountable/prevent deaths. When someone is drunk they lose proper inhibition so they essentially aren’t held responsible for some of their actions. However a completely sober server who is most likely an expert on picking out who has had too much to drink is in a position to stop them. This is why Mo’s argument is moot because a fat person at Mcdonald’s still knows what they’re doing to themselves. Proving that they served him alcohol when he was visibly intoxicated is another story though.
^one guess who you voted for. WTF ever happened to personal responsibility?
Fat Mark Cuban?
You cannot sue a restaurant for killing a person because you cannot pin point the restaurant that did so. Also, if the person is thin but has heart problems you would never know, people can be fat but healthier than a lot of thin people. Also you would then have to sue all restaurants that “killed” that person and also grocery stores that sold that person food. In this instance you can trace back the bar that served too many drinks to a person that killed that person. Even if he just spent that money on boobs and not booze the club took responsibility of him and most likely noticed he was intoxicated. When he first came in and saw he was drunk he got drunk at another bar or his house they could of refused to let him in and not take that responsibility or if he did get drunk at club risque then they should of called the police or cab to take care of him. Also being drunk and behind the wheel could have killed another person and that is why there are the laws as well. If a person ate too much at a restaurant they would just be harming themselves and not other people.